HSRs are not Union Reps: Clearing the confusion

admin • November 24, 2025

When it comes to workplace safety, one role often misunderstood is that of the Health and Safety Representative (HSR). Many people assume HSRs are the same as union representatives — but that’s not the case. While both roles aim to protect workers’ interests, their focus, powers, and responsibilities are quite different.


What Is an HSR?

An HSR is a worker elected by their peers to represent their health and safety interests. They are chosen from within a designated work group and act as a direct link between workers and management on safety matters.

Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic), HSRs have specific powers, such as:

  • Inspecting the workplace for hazards.
  • Accompanying WorkSafe inspectors during visits.
  • Requesting the formation of a health and safety committee.
  • Issuing Provisional Improvement Notices (PINs)

Importantly, HSRs do not negotiate pay, conditions, or other industrial matters — their role is purely about health and safety.


How They Differ from Union Representatives

Union representatives (or delegates) are appointed or elected to represent workers on a wide range of workplace issues, including wages, rosters, and employment conditions. They may also support members in disputes or negotiations with employers.

While an HSR can be a union member — and unions often provide training and support to HSRs — the position itself is independent of union affiliation. You don’t need to be in a union to be elected as an HSR, and you don’t automatically become a union rep by taking on the role.


Why the Distinction Matters

Confusing the two roles can lead to misunderstandings in the workplace. For example:

  • Employers might wrongly assume HSRs are pushing a union agenda, when in fact they are fulfilling legal safety duties.
  • Workers might hesitate to raise safety concerns with an HSR if they are not themselves a union member, due to confusion about their role.

By recognising that HSRs are safety advocates, not industrial negotiators, workplaces can foster more open, constructive conversations about keeping everyone safe.


Bottom line:

In Victoria, HSRs are there to represent their co-workers on OHS matters, helping to make sure your workplace is safe. Whether you’re in a union or not, you can elect an HSR. This is a key way to ensure that consultation is occurring and that you have a conduit through which to raise health and safety concerns.


Remember:
HSRs = Safety advocates under the OHS Act.
Union Reps = Industrial advocates under workplace laws.


So, it is important to know that you can (and have a legislated right to) elect an HSR at your workplace whether or not you work in a unionised workplace. All workplaces will benefit from having elected HSRs and safety structures in place – AND this has been proven to result in safer workplaces.


Not sure how to elect an HSR? Reach out to us at admin@besafevictoria.com.au

The Hazelwood Mine Fire

By admin • February 2, 2026
The 9 th February 2014 was the day that The Hazelwood mine caught fire. It was during a period of extreme fire danger that a bushfire started nearby and sent embers into the open cut coal mine. The fire burnt out of control for 45 days and it took another 72 days for the fire to be put out. The impact on the community and on the workers who helped to fight the fire was horrific. The fire was a large scale environmental and health disaster, with ongoing ramifications for those in the vicinity. It would later become the subject of an inquiry, multiple prosecutions and has been the subject of two books by Tom Doig which make very interesting reading. From an OHS perspective, this event makes an interesting case study. The fire was preventable, and the safety failures resulted in workers being exposed to hazardous conditions, with long term effects. Firefighters and mine personnel faced extreme occupational hazards while responding to the event. These included toxic smoke inhalation, fatigue from prolonged shifts, extreme heat exposure and direct contact with burning coal and ash. Also impacted were volunteers and emergency personnel, as well as members of the public. Inadequate PPE, lack of training and inadequate water infrastructure all added to the hazardous conditions. The physical and psychological impacts continue to this day. It was found that there had been systemic failures in Occupational Health and Safety at the site. The mine operator (Hazelwood Power company, co-owned by Engie and Mitsui & Co) was found to have failed to: Adequately assess the risk of fire in the mine, as a result of external sources such as bushfires Adequately maintain vegetation buffers Have sufficient firefighting water infrastructure Have sufficient and adequately skilled staff on site to respond to fire Have an updated fire mitigation plan and to activate it during periods of extreme fire danger In the words of Colin Radford, WorkSafe CEO: "This was an entirely foreseeable event that has led to significant adverse health impacts” The adverse health impacts were felt by workers and by the broader community. The massive smoke plumes which blanketed Morwell and the Latrobe valley for a prolonged period resulted in many suffering acute and chronic health effects. The Hazelwood mine fire exposed issues with crisis management, safety and health governance and emergency response. The operator of the mine, Hazlewood Power Corporation Pty Ltd was eventually prosecuted by WorkSafe and found guilty and fined. The penalty was $1.56 million for breaching sections 21 and 23 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Hazelwood Pacific Pty Ltd, Australian Power Partners B.V, Hazelwood Churchill Pty Ltd and National Power Australia were found guilty of breaching the Environment Protection Act. They each were fined $95,000 for offences relating to pollution, totalling $380,000. There continues to be ongoing environmental concerns regarding the remaining mine pit. The owner of the mine, French owned company Engie, is required to rehabilitate the site of the now closed open-cut pit. The process for determining the appropriate 'rehabilitation' is still ongoing, with concerns regarding the use of the Latrobe River water for this purpose, the instability of the pit and potential toxicity of the water. The hazards associated with this mine continue to cause concern. For those interested in finding out more about the Hazelwood Mine disaster, Tom Doig’s books are highly recommended reading: Hazelwood by Tom Doig - Penguin Books Australia The Coal Face: Penguin Special by Tom Doig - Penguin Books Australia For more information relating to the ongoing Hazelwood concerns, take a look at: Hazelwood Mine Rehabilitation – Update 2025 Hazelwood Rehabilitation Project

Bushfire

By admin • January 27, 2026
Australia is a fire-prone country, and workplaces in many areas are at risk of being impacted by bushfires in some way. The effects of bushfires may include direct exposure to fire, as well as smoke exposure and psychological impacts. As with any workplace hazard, employers have a duty to manage and control the risk of injury. A bushfire risk assessment should therefore be undertaken. Through this process, employers should: Identify whether there is a potential bushfire hazard Assess the risk of bushfires affecting the health and safety of workers, including smoke exposure Identify appropriate control measures Review control measures to ensure they are effective and that no new hazards have been introduced Consultation with workers should occur at each stage of this process. When developing a bushfire risk assessment and policy, employers should consider the following: How will fire danger ratings be monitored throughout the bushfire season? How vulnerable is the workplace location? What actions will be taken on days of extreme or catastrophic fire danger? Are there workers who travel for work or spend significant time on the road? Are there workers who operate alone or in isolated locations? What emergency and evacuation plans are in place? Once a bushfire policy has been developed in consultation with workers, appropriate training must be provided. Employers are legally required to ensure workers receive the necessary information, instruction, and training to remain safe at work, including in relation to bushfire risks. For more information, take a look at: Working outside - Working near bushfires | Safe Work Australia