OHS Prosecution on Pure Risk

admin • June 17, 2025

The Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 is primarily a risk-based law. That is, it requires the prevention of harm.


The objects of the Act require that health and safety be secured and that risks to health and safety be eliminated at the source, with the highest level of protection against risks being provided. The employer is legally required to eliminate (as far as reasonably practicable) any risk to health and safety. It follows that the majority of offences under the Act are indeed risk-based offences.

This means that a prosecution can occur whether or not the risk has resulted in death or injury. It is enough to have simply exposed a person to the risk of harm.

The argument for this is that the OHS Act aims to prevent injury, disease and death at work.


So why do we see many prosecutions occurring after the harm has in fact materialised into an injury or death?

Perhaps it is due to a public expectation that these horrific incidents should result in some punishment of those responsible?

Perhaps it is that the ultimate evidence of the safety failure is now present – providing a compelling argument as to the egregious nature of the risk that was posed by the breach?

Perhaps there is motivation to provide general deterrence as a result of these tragic events?

It is important to note that the death or injury does not form part of the offence in these prosecutions, rather it forms part of the evidence.


But, we do see pure risk prosecutions.

The regulator can and does charge on the basis of risk only, before the safety failure has resulted in harm to anyone. This is the ultimate outcome – to prevent.

Prosecuting on the basis of risk may be for the purpose of primary prevention, or as the ultimate escalation in a hierarchy of sanctions. It may serve as specific deterrence, to effect change in an individual’s or company’s behaviour. General deterrence is often seen as very important – reinforcing to all duty holders that they are required by law to take a pro-active approach to safety.


Here are a few examples of cases of pure-risk prosecutions:

$7.5K FINE IN PURE RISK FALLS CASE - OHS Reps

$25K FINE IN AHWAZ ROOFING PURE RISK CASE - OHS Reps

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FINED $12K IN ‘PURE RISK’ PROSECUTION - OHS Reps


The following Melbourne Law School presentation also makes for some interesting reading on this topic: CELRL-Seminar-21-May.pdf


Proceeding to prosecution on the basis of risk represents an alignment between prosecution strategies and the principles of the OHS Act. Certainly, it serves as a reminder that duty holders have a legal requirement to provide the highest level of protection and to prevent harm in the workplace.

Racing Industry Workplace Fatalities

By admin • July 8, 2025
In recent times we have seen the tragic deaths of workers in the horse racing industry. In May 2025, Fiona Ralph tragically died following a head injury sustained while working at Bendigo Racecourse. Less than 2 months later, on the 3 rd July 2025, we heard news of Peta Tait, a 43-year-old worker who was killed at Cranbourne Racecourse. It is believed that she was kicked in the head by a horse while in the stable. She was attended to by medical personnel, who were unable to save her. Jockey Blake Shinn has reportedly paid tribute, stating that “This is a painful reminder of the dangers that come with working in such a demanding and unpredictable environment.” (7 news) As the jockey highlights the dangers – we turn our minds to the unique hazards presented by the industry, many of which are covered in the WorkSafe Victoria Guidebook – Horse Stable and track riding safety: Horse stables and track riding safety | WorkSafe Victoria . The guide is intended to provide information for those working in the industry and outlines how to identify hazards and implement risk control measures. As in all industries, the employer is responsible for providing a safe workplace, and the usual obligations to consult with the workforce and to control hazards in line with the hierarchy of control all apply. There is a section which specifically covers the safety of stables. Of course, horses are strong and unpredictable, and they pose a specific hazard in this industry - and one which cannot be eliminated as part of this particular workplace. The document discusses the need for training and supervision, which is required in all workplaces. Also, the use of PPE as a control measure, indicating that the use of appropriate footwear, helmets and body protection may be required to ensure the safety of those riding, training, feeding and working with horses and cleaning stables. Working alone can also increase the risks of working around horses. According to SafeWork NSW ‘One worker is hospitalised each day in Australia due to a horse related injury’ . Not all of these are workers; however, it does highlight how dangerous working around horses can be. WorkSafe Victoria reports injury claims attributable to horse racing at: Injury hotspots - Horse racing | WorkSafe Victoria . While the racing community must, of course, grieve the recent loss of two of its’ workers, there will concurrently be a WorkSafe investigation and a Victoria Police investigation for the Coroner. No matter the outcome of these investigations, it is an opportunity to look to industry work practices and identify any improvements which could be made to improve safety in the future. The gravity of such an event cannot be underestimated in its’ impact to family, friends and workmates. One can only hope that an improvement in future safety may be one of those impacts. Our sincere condolences to the families of Fiona and Peta.

The Safety Spotlight on Small Business

By admin • July 1, 2025
The rise of podcasts has made learning and information so accessible and learning about OHS is no different. We came across the WorkSafe Act podcast ‘The Safety Spotlight’ episode on ‘Small Business’. In this podcast, Jacqui Argius, the WorkSafe ACT Commissioner talks about safety in small business . She is joined by Michelle Boundy in a podcast led by Lish Fejer. They discuss a number of matters relating to safety in the small business environment, which are summarised below. Small businesses are required to be compliant with safety legislation, no matter how small they are. It is often the case that small businesses have less OHS expertise. Sometimes they may think that a serious incident ‘won’t happen here’. They may not have a good understanding of what their legal obligations are. Sometimes there may be a ‘fear factor’ about their lack of understanding of how to meet their legal obligations. They may think that they are too small to need proper systems. But – just because they are small, this doesn’t mean that they don’t need to meet the same requirements as the larger businesses when it comes to safety, and this includes both physical and psychosocial safety. Small businesses must also have WorkCover insurance. Like in all businesses, consultation is key. ‘Talking to your workers’ is so important to ensuring a safe workplace. This includes ensuring that young workers and those from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds can understand. Guidance material regarding how to communicate safety information is available. The importance of training is also covered. Small businesses must have an induction process and ongoing training for their workers. Employees must also be trained in how to report hazards. The application of risk management systems and the hierarchy of controls is the same in small business as in any workplace, as is the concept of ‘ reasonably practicable ’. The commissioner highlights that the cost of implementing a control will not be considered to be important if a matter goes to court. The employer must eliminate or implement controls to all risks to health and safety. The podcasters acknowledge that there are a myriad of pressures on small businesses – but highlight that this does not reduce their obligations in relation to safety. Nor does it exempt the business from enforcement by the regulator: ‘we will be regulating them the same as anyone else’. Overall, the podcast highlights the need for small business owners to be pro-active and build a safety-first culture. To listen to the WorkSafe ACT Small Business Podcast, check out: Ep. 2 - Small Business There are many resources available to small business to ensure that they are providing and safe and healthy workplace. In Victoria these include: Getting some help from WorkSafe through the OHS Essentials program, which is free to small business and a great place to start. Accessing health and safety checklists as a way to begin a self-assessment. Reading about your obligations and legal requirements. Take a look at the WorkSafe website to access these resources here: Small business | WorkSafe Victoria