Failure to supervise is an indictable offence.

admin • January 28, 2025

Section 21 of the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 - Duties of employers to employees dictates that employers must provide ‘supervision to employees as is necessary to enable those persons to perform their work in a way that is safe and without risks to health’.


Failure to do so is an indictable offence.


Who must be supervised?

It is the legal responsibility of the employer to provide supervision in order to ensure workers are following safety instructions and working safely – but who does this include?

The legal obligation to supervise extends to any person to which the employer has a duty to provide a safe workplace. This includes:

-         Direct workers – full time, part time, or casual

-         Labour hire workers

-         Independent contractors

-         Employees of independent contractors


Who can be a supervisor?

In order to effectively supervise workers, the designated supervisor must be competent and trained to carry out this role. Before undertaking a supervisory role, the person should:

-         Be trained in OHS legislation

-         Be trained in workplace policies and procedures

-         Understand all the obligations under OHS laws

-         Understand what the workers’ experience and skills are

-         Understand the tasks being carried out and what safety requirements apply to these tasks

-         Understand the level of training required for workers to safely undertake these tasks

-         Have authority to make decisions and act on OHS issues immediately

-         Be resourced to carry out their OHS supervisor obligations effectively and meaningfully

The supervisor should not only receive training before becoming a supervisor but should also attend regular refresher training.


Do you want to know more about supervision and whether your workplace is meeting its’ legal obligations? Take a look at Safety supervision: Creating an environment for effective supervision | WorkSafe Victoria

 

Education: The Key to Workplace Safety

By admin • June 24, 2025
At BeSafe Victoria, we live, eat and breathe safety education. Why? Because we believe it is the key to workplace safety. We see and hear the on-the-ground OHS stories from our participants on a daily basis, both during training and while providing follow-up support. It is remarkable to see the transformation that occurs during a training course, as participants grow their safety knowledge and become empowered to influence their own safety and that of their workplace. In regional Victoria, it is not uncommon for OHS Literacy to be very low. This is not in all workplaces, but certainly our experience shows that many workers have received very little or no training in OHS. By gaining an understanding of OHS, we can empower individuals to keep themselves safe. This includes in understanding their rights, recognising hazards, mitigating risks and knowing when to say no to unsafe work. Training an individual also means that they can bring this new knowledge to their workplace, leading to positive improvements in safety outcomes for their colleagues. Safety training has broader implications too – it can inspire conversations with family and friends, creating a ‘ripple effect’ of improved safety awareness in the community. We often see participants who deeply care about safety and have put their hand up to become a Health and Safety Representative (HSR) in their workplace. These participants come in with the drive and walk out with the tools and the passion they need to make a really tangible difference in their workplace. We know of many stories of trained HSR’s who go on to transform the safety of their workplaces. Whether we are duty holders, supervisors, HSR’s, or employees – we all have a role to play in the safety of our workplace – and with the right knowledge, we can make a positive contribution.  What truly underpins a safe work environment? The answer lies in education .

OHS Prosecution on Pure Risk

By admin • June 17, 2025
The Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 is primarily a risk-based law. That is, it requires the prevention of harm. The objects of the Act require that health and safety be secured and that risks to health and safety be eliminated at the source, with the highest level of protection against risks being provided. The employer is legally required to eliminate (as far as reasonably practicable) any risk to health and safety. It follows that the majority of offences under the Act are indeed risk-based offences. This means that a prosecution can occur whether or not the risk has resulted in death or injury. It is enough to have simply exposed a person to the risk of harm. The argument for this is that the OHS Act aims to prevent injury, disease and death at work. So why do we see many prosecutions occurring after the harm has in fact materialised into an injury or death? Perhaps it is due to a public expectation that these horrific incidents should result in some punishment of those responsible? Perhaps it is that the ultimate evidence of the safety failure is now present – providing a compelling argument as to the egregious nature of the risk that was posed by the breach? Perhaps there is motivation to provide general deterrence as a result of these tragic events? It is important to note that the death or injury does not form part of the offence in these prosecutions, rather it forms part of the evidence. But, we do see pure risk prosecutions. The regulator can and does charge on the basis of risk only, before the safety failure has resulted in harm to anyone. This is the ultimate outcome – to prevent . Prosecuting on the basis of risk may be for the purpose of primary prevention, or as the ultimate escalation in a hierarchy of sanctions. It may serve as specific deterrence, to effect change in an individual’s or company’s behaviour. General deterrence is often seen as very important – reinforcing to all duty holders that they are required by law to take a pro-active approach to safety. Here are a few examples of cases of pure-risk prosecutions: $7.5K FINE IN PURE RISK FALLS CASE - OHS Reps $25K FINE IN AHWAZ ROOFING PURE RISK CASE - OHS Reps CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FINED $12K IN ‘PURE RISK’ PROSECUTION - OHS Reps The following Melbourne Law School presentation also makes for some interesting reading on this topic: CELRL-Seminar-21-May.pdf Proceeding to prosecution on the basis of risk represents an alignment between prosecution strategies and the principles of the OHS Act . Certainly, it serves as a reminder that duty holders have a legal requirement to provide the highest level of protection and to prevent harm in the workplace.