The Delacombe Trench Disaster

admin • March 17, 2026

The Delacombe Trench Disaster.

21st March 2018 - The day 2 men fell into a trench and became the catalyst for Manslaughter Laws in Victoria.

On an ordinary morning in March 2018, two Victorian workers—Charlie Howkins, 34, and Jack Brownlee, 21—left their homes expecting a routine day on a construction site on the outskirts of Ballarat. By afternoon, both men had lost their lives in a preventable catastrophic event which shook the Ballarat community and sparked a long, painful fight for justice.

Years later, the Delacombe trench collapse remains a defining case in Victoria’s workplace safety landscape.

What Happened in Delacombe?

The two men were working on the construction of sewer pipelines on a residential development ‘Winterfield Estate’ where Pipecon Pty Ltd had been engaged by Goldfields Winterfields Pty Ltd. The trenches being constructed on the day of the incident were approximately 4m in depth.

The men were standing on the ground in the vicinity the trench and when the trench collapsed, they fell in.

The collapse was sudden and devastating. Charlie was killed immediately, while Jack was trapped by the dirt for a prolonged period of time before being found.

“At 10am the supervisor and other employees met at the break room for smoko, however the two employees working on manhole 8 did not join them. 

At approximately 11am two subcontractors arrived at manhole 8 and saw that the stub branch trench had collapsed.” (WorkSafe)

Frantic attempts to rescue Jack resulted in him being extricated alive after a protracted process by emergency services. He was flown to Melbourne for treatment, but tragically died the following day.

The tragedy left two families shattered—Charlie’s wife, Lana Cormie, suddenly became a single parent to their two young children, while Janine and Dave Brownlee faced the unimaginable loss of a son just beginning his adult life.

Prosecution

The employer, Pipecon Pty Ltd, was investigated by WorkSafe Victoria and Victoria Police. Investigations revealed breaches under The Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 and resulted in two charges being laid under Section 21 ‘Duties of employers to employees.’

The charges were as follows:

“failing to maintain battering or benching of the excavation and to use trench shields and manhole cages to protect the workers from the risk of engulfment and;

failing to provide supervision to ensure its employees did not perform work in the trench without battering, benching, trench shields or manhole cages.” (WorkSafe Vic)

The charges carried 9000 penalty points each (which at the time were $161.19 per point), meaning a potential fine of $3million.

Pipecon initially pleaded ‘not guilty’ and the case was prepared for trial after lengthy court delays.

Eventually, in negotiation with the Department of Public Prosecutions, one charge against the company was dropped and Pipecon pleaded guilty to the second charge.

The company was eventually convicted and fined $550,000 for breaching workplace safety laws.

Despite the conviction, many felt the legal process left unanswered questions, particularly because there was no trial - “the guilty plea meant there was only a cursory investigation of the OHS elements of the incident”. (SafetyAtWorkBlog)

Families and advocates argued that the penalty did not reflect the gravity of the loss or the preventability of the incident.

The Coroners Court

There were multiple Coroners involved in the handling of the case, with a protracted process taking until 2025. Coroner Jacqui Hawkins ordered further investigations into their deaths, including seeking statements from first responders. This would ultimately uncover the evidence which would reveal Jack’s declaration that “he and Charlie had been standing on the edge of the trench when it gave way.” (Coroners findings)

Coroner Leveasque Peterson determined not to hold an inquest into the deaths of Charlie and Jack, despite the families’ requests. The findings were made in 2025 without inquest and found that “Pipecon failed to ensure a safe workplace on 21 March 2018” and as a result Charlie and Jack lost their lives. The deaths were deemed to be “Preventable” but Coroner Peterson failed to make recommendations toward the prevention of similar deaths in the future. (Coroners Court Findings)

Despite the long awaited release of the coronial findings, safety experts argued that the “coronial findings have come without the opportunities offered by a formal inquest” claiming that “The available answers seem insufficient.” (SafetyatWorkBlog) The lack of a full inquest meant that the case was never publicly examined in depth.

Workplace Manslaughter Laws

The Delacombe tragedy became a key driver behind Victoria’s push for workplace manslaughter legislation, introduced on 1 July 2020.

The trench disaster and the public footage was shocking and gained the attention of Victoria’s lawmakers who promised to strength the legislation. The introduction of changes were intended “to prevent workplace death, provide a stronger deterrent for duty holders to comply with their occupational health and safety obligations, and to send a strong message that putting people's lives at risk in the workplace will not be tolerated.” And carries a penalty of up to 25 years imprisonment and up to $16.5million in fines.(WorkSafe Victoria)

Deceased workers’ families, including the families of Charlie and Jack, played a central role in campaigning for these reforms alongside unions advocating for workers’ rights.

 

Lessons for Industry

The construction industry continues to be among the most dangerous industries. In the case of trenching and excavation works, cases such as the Delacombe disaster should serve as a reminder of the importance of the safety requirements for conducting such works.

·        Trenches can collapse without warning. Proper shoring, benching, or shielding is non-negotiable.

·        Trenches and excavations present a fall-from-height risk and workers must be protected from this potentially fatal hazard. This includes fall protection and exclusion zones.

·        Training of all personnel (including managers, supervisors and workers) is key in ensuring a safe workplace.

·        Competent and present supervision is essential on any worksite, especially those involving high risk work.

·        Companies must prioritise safety not as a compliance checkbox but as a core operational value. There is a duty to maintain safe systems of work. This means reassessing safety (including SWMS) as conditions change.

·        Companies must have, and practice, rescue procedures in the case of an incident.

Hazards must be identified and risks eliminated, with guidance material readily available at: ISBN-Compliance-code-excavation-2019-12.pdf and ISBN-Compliance-code-prevention-falls-general-construction-2019-12.pdf


Sources and further reading:

Prosecutions - OHS Reps

Still insufficient answers to the Delacombe trench deaths – SafetyAtWorkBlog

PIPECON DOUBLE FATALITY – CORONOR’S INQUIRY HIGHLIGHTS EMPLOYER FAILURE - OHS Reps

Prosecution Result Summaries and Enforceable Undertakings | WorkSafe Victoria

Pipecon charged over Delacombe trench tragedy that killed Jack Brownlee and Charlie Howkins | The Courier | Ballarat, VIC

Company charged over trench collapse deaths | WorkSafe Victoria               

Findings | Coroners Court of Victoria

Victoria's new workplace manslaughter offences | WorkSafe Victoria

Image credit: Ballarat Courier

 

We pay our respects to those who have lost their lives at work and acknowledge the pain and suffering of those left behind.

Everyone has the right to come home from work alive and well at the end of the day.


By admin June 9, 2026
The veterinary profession can be one of the most rewarding careers, but it’s also one of the most emotionally and mentally demanding. Behind the compassion, skill, and dedication lies a reality many outside the industry don’t see: long hours, emotionally charged cases, financial pressures, and the emotional toll of euthanasia and client grief. With Victoria’s new psychological health regulations now in effect (as of December 2025), workplaces must manage psychological risks with the same seriousness as physical hazards. For veterinary practices, this is not just a compliance requirement, it’s a lifeline for the wellbeing of their teams. The Hidden Pressures in Veterinary Work Veterinary professionals may face a multitude of psychosocial hazards, including: Exposure to traumatic events Aggression and violence High job demands and time pressure Low job control Remote or isolated work Poor workplace relationships and minimal support Moral and ethical dilemmas are also a feature of the work as well as the exposure to grief and loss. Thinking of Veterinarians as first responders can help to understand the types of psychosocial hazards which they face. These factors can lead to burnout, compassion fatigue, anxiety, depression, and tragically, higher-than-average suicide rates in the profession. Suicide rates are up to four times higher than the general population, making the industry’s psychological hazards the most common fatal risk in the veterinary workplace. Why BeSafe Victoria’s Training Matters BeSafe Victoria’s psychosocial safety training is a new course designed to help participant’s: Understand the Psychological Health Compliance Code Identify psychosocial hazards Follow a risk management process for psychosocial hazards Implement practical controls Ensure consultation is compliant and effective At BeSafe Victoria, we deliver training designed by WorkSafe for Health and Safety Representatives. However, it is also an excellent course for leaders and teams to ensure the psychological safety of their workplace. In turn, this helps us all to work towards improved psychological outcomes for Veterinarians and the industry more broadly. The Benefits for Veterinary Practices Investing in psychological safety training can: Ensure compliance with the OHS legislation Improve staff retention and team morale Improve the psychological health of veterinary teams Enhance team consultation, collaboration and trust Reduce rates of psychological harm Contact us to find out more about our courses and how we can help you. This may include providing advice on designated work groups, electing HSRs, or delivering training. Please reach out on 0467 002 060 or info@besafevictoria.com.au
By admin June 1, 2026
Maintaining a safe workplace is a legal and moral obligation. One of the most powerful tools available to workers, specifically Health and Safety Representatives (HSRs), is the Provisional Improvement Notice (PIN) . Used correctly, PINs can quickly resolve safety issues and ensure compliance with the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) . There have been recent changes made to the PIN notice and we recommend that HSRs now use the new version. Summary of NEW Changes: Part 5 has been modified to include tick boxes for each of OHS Act, OHS regulations or the Psychological Health Regulations to be selected by the HSR Part 6 has been modified to include whether the safety issue is a contravention relating to a physical or psychological hazard What is a PIN? A Provisional Improvement Notice (PIN) is a formal written notice issued by an HSR to address a workplace health and safety issue. It is used when consultation with the employer has failed to resolve a problem. *In Victoria, an HSR can issue a PIN whether or not they have completed an HSR training course. This is different to other jurisdictions. Under Victorian law, an HSR can issue a PIN if they believe, on reasonable grounds, that: A provision of the OHS Act or regulations is being breached, or A breach has occurred and is likely to continue or happen again The purpose of a PIN is simple: To require action to fix a safety problem and prevent harm to workers. It is a legal document which the employer must respond to. Who Can Issue a PIN? Health and Safety Representative (HSR)’s can issue a PIN. *Don’t forget that Victorian HSRs can issue a PIN even if they haven’t yet had the opportunity to get into a 5 Day Initial OHS Training Course. (Although obviously HSRs are best to complete their training as soon as possible so that they can fully understand the OHS Act and their role.) An HSR must: Represent a designated work group (DWG) Have reasonable grounds to believe a breach exists Consult with the employer first before issuing the notice When Should a PIN Be Used? A PIN should be used as a last resort, after attempts to resolve the issue through consultation have failed. An HSR can choose to issue a PIN notice if the duty holder is contravening any provision of the OHS Act or any of the Regulations, or if the duty holder is believed to have been in contravention and it is likely that the contravention will continue or be repeated. But, they must have first consulted with the duty holder. Remember that for immediate or serious risks , a PIN may not be appropriate. In those cases, an HSR can direct work to cease under the Act. How to Issue a PIN 1. Identify the Issue Clearly identify the hazard or breach of the OHS Act or Regulations. 2. Consult with the Employer Before issuing a PIN, the HSR must consult with the employer or the person responsible and give them a chance to fix the problem. Where such consultations are ineffective, the employer refuses to consult and / or the HSR believes that the safety issue will continue, then the HSR may issue a PIN. 3. Complete the PIN It is not compulsory to use the WorkSafe Victoria PIN form, but it does make life easier. You can find it here: Provisional-improvement-notice-form-2026-05.pdf A valid PIN must include: Section 1 – fill out the details of the elected HSR under the OHS act (or the elected deputy HSR if the HSR is unavailable) Section 2 – fill out the details of the duty holder. Most commonly, this will be your employer. Section 3 – tick that you have consulted with your employer or their representative prior to issuing the PIN. It is a good idea to keep a written record of the consultation or attempted consultation. Section 4 – fill out the details of the person (employer representative) to whom you are giving the PIN. Section 5 – fill out which sections of The Act or The Regulations are believed to have been contravened. You can only include one health and safety issue on a PIN notice. If there are more than one, you will need to issue a separate PIN notice for each issue. Tick the box to make clear if the contravention relates to the OHS Act, the OHS Regulations or the Psychological Regulations. Section 6 – provide detail of the contravention. Include the site location ie: the actual area of the workplace where you believe the contravention to be occurring. State whether the PIN relates to a physical or psychological hazard. Section 7 – optional – you may fill out suggestions as to how the safety issue can be fixed if you wish, but this is not required. Section 8 – sign and date the form. Provide a compliance date that is AT LEAST 8 days after the PIN issue date. Make sure the timeframe is reasonable. 4. Issue the Notice The PIN must be delivered to the person you state in Section 4. It can be delivered in person, by post or other formal delivery methods. Don't forget to keep a copy of the PIN for your own records. What Happens After a PIN Is Issued? Once a PIN is issued, the recipient has legal obligations. They must: Bring the notice to the attention of their employer (if the person is an employee). Bring the notice to the attention of persons whose work is affected by the notice, including informing affected workers. Display the PIN in a prominent place in the workplace. Fix the issue by the specified compliance date. Failure to comply is an offence under the OHS Act , and penalties may apply. Can the duty holder dispute the PIN? If the employer (or recipient) disagrees with the PIN, they can contact WorkSafe Victoria and request an inspector review within 7 days of receiving the PIN. If no review is requested within 7 days, the PIN remains legally enforceable. What does an HSR do if the employer does not comply? If the employer has not complied with the PIN within the specified timeframe or if the employer’s intention is not to comply, then the HSR can call WorkSafe Advisory Service and arrange for an inspector to visit the workplace. The inspector can then: Confirm the PIN Modify it Cancel it Support and Advice If you need support and advice on how to issue a PIN, you can contact: WorkSafe Advisory 1800136089 WorkSafe HSR Support Officers HSRSO@worksafe.vic.gov.au Your Union BeSafe Victoria info@besafevictoria.com.au PINs are an important mechanism for preventing injuries and saving lives . They are a powerful and practical tool in Victoria’s workplace safety system. For HSRs, understanding when and how to use a PIN is essential. For employers, knowing how to respond to PINs promptly and effectively is vital. If you need training to understand more, contact us: info@besafevictoria.com.au 0467002060