Risk Assessment Processes.

admin • December 16, 2024

In any workplace, ensuring the safety and well-being of employees is paramount. One of the most effective ways to achieve this is through a comprehensive risk assessment process. This process helps identify potential hazards, evaluate the risks associated with them, and implement measures to control or eliminate these risks.

This is a continuous and ongoing process, as shown in the diagram above.

Step 1: Identify Hazards

The first step in the risk assessment process is to identify potential hazards in the workplace. Hazards can be anything that may cause harm, such as:

Mechanical Hazards: Machinery, equipment or other items that could cause physical or impact harm.
Chemical and Biological Hazards: Harmful substances or chemicals, including pathogens.
Source of Energy: Such as electricity, heat, noise, light and radiation.
Body Stressing or Impact Hazards: Activities which cause stress to the body. For example poor workstation design, repetitive movements, manual handling tasks and slip and trip hazards.
Gravity: Activities where a person can fall or an object can fall on people.
Psychosocial Hazards: Events, circumstances or systems of work which can lead to psychological illness, including stress, harassment, workplace violence and fatigue.

Step 2: Assess the Risks

Once hazards are identified, the next step is to assess the risks associated with each hazard. This involves evaluating the likelihood of the hazard causing harm and the severity of the potential consequences. Consider the following factors:

Frequency of Exposure: How often employees are exposed to the hazard.
Duration of Exposure: How long employees are exposed to the hazard.
Severity of Potential Harm: The potential impact on health and safety.

It can be useful to use the Likelihood Consequence Table to help with assessing the risks (see below).

Step 2: Implement Control Measures

After assessing the risks, it’s crucial to implement control measures to mitigate or eliminate the risks. Control measures can be categorized into:

Elimination: Removing the hazard entirely from the workplace.
Substitution: Replacing the hazard with a less dangerous one.
Engineering Controls: Isolating people from the hazard through physical changes to the workplace.
Administrative Controls: Changing work procedures or policies to reduce exposure to the hazard.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Providing employees with protective gear to minimize exposure.

It can be useful to use the Hierarchy of Control diagram to help you during this process (see below).

Remember that you must always use the highest possible level of control possible.

Step 4: Monitor and Review

Risk assessment is not a one-time activity. It’s essential to continuously monitor and review the effectiveness of the control measures. Regularly update the risk assessment to reflect any changes in the workplace, such as new equipment, processes, or personnel. Encourage employees to report new hazards and participate in the risk assessment process.

It is also important to make sure that your new control measure have not inadvertently introduced a new risk or hazard into your work environment.

Documentation

Documenting the risk assessment process is crucial for accountability and compliance. Keep detailed records of identified hazards, risk assessments, and implemented control measures. Communicate the findings and safety measures to all employees to ensure they are aware of the risks and how to protect themselves.

Consultation

Don't forget that at every stage of the risk assessment process, you must consult with the workforce. This is a legal obligation, but it is also extremely useful to the employer, as the workers who are doing the job are in the best position to identify risks and hazards in their own work environment and to find ways to control them too.

By following these steps and principles - organisations can create a safer work environment, reduce the likelihood of incidents and injuries, and promote a culture of safety. Remember, a proactive approach to risk assessment not only protects employees but also enhances productivity and morale.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

10 Pathways to Death and Disaster

By admin • March 18, 2025

Michael Quinlan’s book ‘Ten Pathways to Death and Disaster’ includes a review of fatal mine incidents. What he found was that the each disaster was preceded by common causes. There are 10 recurring reasons why disasters happen in the workplace. He describes 10 pathways: Pathway 1: engineering, design and maintenance flaws Pathway 2: failure to heed warning signs Pathway 3: flaws in risk assessment Pathway 4: flaws in management systems Pathway 5: flaws in system auditing Pathway 6: economic or reward pressures compromising safety Pathway 7: failures in regulatory oversight Pathway 8: worker or supervisor concerns that were ignored Pathway 9: poor worker or management communication and trust Pathway 10: flaws in emergency and rescue procedures In most cases, at least 3 of these pathways will be present. However, some cases will have features of all 10. The 10 pathways don’t just apply to mine incidents – they have been applied across other high hazard workplaces and have found to be equally relevant across industries. Ultimately, this shows that death and disaster in the workplace is predictable and preventable – so why do major industries continue to kill in the same old ways? If the 10 Pathways approach defines the issues which lead to major incidents, then why aren’t these being used to prevent such events? In other jurisdictions, the 10 Pathways Theory has been used to inform prevention. Perhaps it is something which regulators, employers, and also HSR’s could consider when thinking about how to prevent death and injury in Victorian Workplaces. Ten Pathways to Death and Disaster eBook - The Federation Press

The Sentencing of OHS Offences in Victoria

By admin • March 11, 2025

The Sentencing Advisory Council (SAC) has recently reviewed the sentencing of breaches of the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004. Through their review, they discovered that there is a need to change sentencing practices in Victoria. They found that punishments were often not appropriate and not in line with community expectations, and that sentencing orders such as adverse publicity orders and health and safety orders are being underutilised. In addition, many fines are going unpaid. Following a period of review and consultation, the SAC has recently published its’ report into the sentencing of OHS offences in Victoria. The SAC have made 12 recommendations, divided into 3 categories: 1. Victim related recommendations – relating to victim impact statements and restorative justice. 2. Sentencing Practices – relating to enforceable undertakings/ health and safety orders, adverse publicity orders, increasing penalties for OHS breaches and the inclusion of Sentencing Guidelines in the OHS Act. 3. Fine Payment – relating to fines being paid to WorkSafe, reviews of fines outstanding, declared director notices and successor liability. The recommendation to introduce Sentencing Guidelines would follow the example of the UK, where they already exist. However, Victoria will represent a world first if these guidelines are introduced as recommended – in legislation. If implemented, this suite of changes could lead to much improved Occupational Health and Safety outcomes for Victorian workplaces. Interested in finding out more? Take a look at: Sentencing Advisory Council Recommends Major Changes to Sentencing of Workplace Safety Offences | Sentencing Council